what the internet says

not enough to score

read from 27 public comments, but too little of it said how the film moves — the shape is below, without a number on it

👆 rate this vibe

Waterworld

Name: Waterworld
Genre: Adventure, Action, Science Fiction
Released: 1995-07-28
Duration: 135 min

Beyond the horizon lies the secret to a new beginning.

19952h 15mcritics 6.2/10

Adventure Action Science Fiction

In a futuristic world where the polar ice caps have melted and made Earth a liquid planet, a beautiful barmaid rescues a mutant seafarer from a floating island prison. They escape, along with her young charge, Enola, and sail off aboard his ship. But the trio soon becomes the target of a menacing pirate who covets the map to 'Dryland'—which is tattooed on Enola's back.

starring Kevin Costner, Dennis Hopper, Jeanne Tripplehorn, Tina Majorino

FLICKFEEL

—

from 27 comments

COMMUNITY

—

nobody yet

YOURS

—

…

what the internet says

FUN

how good a time it was

MEANINGFUL

how much it moved you

Two separate readings, not parts of the score — the score says how much of it held you, these say what kind of watch it was.

Nobody has rated this on FlickFeel yet. This is public discussion of this title, read into a curve. It is not a rating and it never becomes one.

Read from 27 comments (24 from Metacritic, 3 from TMDB reviews) — 3 of them described how it moves.

Thin evidence — the shape below rests on 3 comments. The shaded band is how wide the uncertainty actually is, and it is drawn to scale.

Not enough people said when to name this shape. The line is what the evidence draws, not a finding.

Hover the curveDrag across the curve to see what people said at any point.

height: how intense it got, 0–100
gold above: how tender it felt. violet below — what it cost. Thick on both at once means it was doing both.
grey haze: how sure we are — wider means fewer people described it

what people actually wrote

Grouped by where it was written, because a considered review and a reaction typed an hour after the credits are different things. Every quote links to its source.

Metacritic20 read

“just plain fun to watch from start to finish”
TrergFirestormabout 0–100% inread it ↗
“especially its villain(s) feel so comically 90s, that it's almost unbearable to watch them literally kill people in a post apocalypse while slapsticking themselves only 30 seconds later”
glommanabout 75–100% inread it ↗
“Kevin Costner acts like a total **** for over two hours”
warrenworldabout 0–100% inread it ↗
“Yeah this is one of those movies you weren't supposed to like and in so many ways I didn't but in all the right ways I did! The adventure, the fantasy, and the super-subtle sci-fi elements here just played so well. Really wish that they would have made the villain so much more than a Mad-Max crazy guy.”
tentongeekread it ↗

TMDB2 read

“**Rather poorly edited and cut, this film is downright forgettable.** I've seen this movie twice, and I honestly can't believe it. It was truly the same as burning money. After being impressed by the poor quality of the film, I went to read and research about it, and discovered the eventual cause of this disaster: from the beginning, it was a project doomed to failure. Badly planned, it was filmed in a place where the weather conditions would cause problems. The ambition to do more and better”
Filipe Manuel Netoread it ↗
“**Score: 8/10 An Ambitious, Misunderstood, and Genuinely Entertaining Epic** *Waterworld* has long been the punchline of Hollywood excess a byword for bloated budgets, troubled productions, and critical derision. Its TMDB score reflects this reputation, a casualty of its own mythologised failures. But watching it now, decades removed from the hype and the hatchet jobs, reveals a different truth: *Waterworld* is not the disaster it was painted to be. It is an ambitious, visually stunning, an”
misubisuread it ↗

Waterworld

what the internet says

what shaped this

what critics said

what people actually wrote

🏷️ community feel tags

🎯 watch next if you liked this energy