pulling the feels…
pulling the feels…
FLICKFEEL
61
from 59 comments
COMMUNITY
—
nobody yet
YOURS
—
…
FUN
4
how good a time it was
MEANINGFUL
39
how much it moved you
Two separate readings, not parts of the score — the score says how much of it held you, these say what kind of watch it was.
Nobody has rated this on FlickFeel yet. This is public discussion of this title, read into a curve. It is not a rating and it never becomes one.
Read from 59 comments (50 from Metacritic, 9 from TMDB reviews) — 20 of them described how it moves.
➖ steady — Holds one level all the way. Hard going most of the way through. Very little of it ever resolves. Marked above the line: 1 moment that made people jump.
Hover the curveDrag across the curve to see what people said at any point.
“The run time is perhaps a little longer than it needs to be”
r96sk · TMDB reviews ↗
“Nothing's shocking, horrifying or engaging”
No · TMDB reviews ↗
“it went downhill after that opening scene with the patient”
Sejian · TMDB reviews ↗
“The opening prologue is particularly gripping, setting a tense and immersive tone right from the start.”
RalphRahal · TMDB reviews ↗
“it’s overlong by 30-35 minutes, but I liked the way it had the confidence to take its time”
Wuchak · TMDB reviews ↗
“the second half really picks up momentum”
Wuchak · TMDB reviews ↗
Read 28 Aug 2026 · confidence 100% · scored on the same 0-100 scale as a community score · how this works
Published reviews, not felt experience — a different question from the one above, and never mixed into the FlickFeel score.
“Smile 2, directed by Parker Finn, is more thematically ambitious than the original, which also allows Finn to stage more satisfyingly ridiculous kills and ramp up its air of delirium”
Beatrice Loayza, The New York Times · 90
“Smile 2 is more of the same. A lot more. But it’s just as scary, and this time it’s feistier and funnier, proving that the premise has legs and also some malleability.”
William Bibbiani, TheWrap · 88
“Yes, the varying quality of performances from the supporting cast and the film’s slightly bloated 127-minute runtime might leave cheeks straining. But the film finds dark humor in taking these desperate feelings of unease and feeding them to a kaleidoscopic creature of pain and viscera.”
Matt Schimkowitz, The A.V. Club · 83
“Smile 2 is bigger, scarier, funnier, smarter, darker, and undeniably better than its predecessor.”
Austen Goslin, Polygon · 83
“The entity's visage is shocking, its effects personal and malevolent, and the film had some terrifying set pieces, creating a mysterious new supernatural creature to lose sleep over.”
Jeff Ewing, Collider · 80
Scores from Metacritic and Rotten Tomatoes, read 28 Aug 2026. Quotes belong to their publications and link to the full reviews.
it reviews better than it plays — critics 77, the watch 61
Grouped by where it was written, because a considered review and a reaction typed an hour after the credits are different things. Every quote links to its source.
“starts off with plenty of confidence”
JeBjBoabout 0–15% inread it ↗
“This one is even slower and longer—especially without any good reason, with songs thrown in just to stretch the runtime because they add nothing.”
KhalielPrimeabout 0–100% inread it ↗
“and even the ending is downright disappointing.”
KhalielPrimeabout 75–100% inread it ↗
“Smile 2 started off crazy.”
QueenTabout 0–15% inread it ↗
“The run time is perhaps a little longer than it needs to be”
r96skabout 0–100% inread it ↗
“Nothing's shocking, horrifying or engaging”
Noabout 0–100% inread it ↗
“it went downhill after that opening scene with the patient”
Sejianabout 10–100% inread it ↗
“The opening prologue is particularly gripping, setting a tense and immersive tone right from the start.”
RalphRahalabout 0–15% inread it ↗
no tags yet — rate this flick to drop some vibes ✨