pulling the feels…
pulling the feels…
FLICKFEEL
—
from 15 comments
COMMUNITY
—
nobody yet
YOURS
—
…
FUN
0
how good a time it was
MEANINGFUL
0
how much it moved you
Two separate readings, not parts of the score — the score says how much of it held you, these say what kind of watch it was.
Nobody has rated this on FlickFeel yet. This is public discussion of this title, read into a curve. It is not a rating and it never becomes one.
Read from 15 comments (14 from Metacritic, 1 from TMDB reviews) — 2 of them described how it moves.
Thin evidence — the shape below rests on 2 comments. The shaded band is how wide the uncertainty actually is, and it is drawn to scale.
Not enough people said when to name this shape. The line is what the evidence draws, not a finding.
Hover the curveDrag across the curve to see what people said at any point.
“Were there parts that were slow and maybe unnecessary?”
AceHall · Metacritic ↗
“The main story doesn't emerge until an hour has passed with the first hour being slow, uninteresting and just plain aggravating.”
hoops2448 · Metacritic ↗
Read 28 Aug 2026 · confidence 3% · too thin for a score · how this works
Published reviews, not felt experience — a different question from the one above, and never mixed into the FlickFeel score.
“One of those guilty pleasures of the summer. It’s also one of those action movies that could have been ruined if Jerry Bruckheimer had taken charge of it.”
Kevin Carr, Film Threat · 80
“As the team leader, Jackson finds exactly the right tone for the role: a sort of playful cockiness that comes from knowing just how good he is. He's clearly having fun, but he never winks at the audience too much or allows his performance to devolve into camp.”
Nathan Rabin, The A.V. Club · 80
“Directed by Clark Johnson in an efficient and occasionally exhilarating style that points to the Emmy-winner's TV cop-show pedigree ("Homicide," "The Wire," "NYPD Blue").”
Steven Rea, Philadelphia Inquirer · 75
“One of the best cop thrillers since "Training Day."”
Roger Ebert, Chicago Sun-Times · 75
“Aware of its own cuteness because the dialogue plays by the rules of meta-entertainment.”
Lisa Schwarzbaum, Entertainment Weekly · 75
Scores from Metacritic and Rotten Tomatoes, read 28 Aug 2026. Quotes belong to their publications and link to the full reviews.
Grouped by where it was written, because a considered review and a reaction typed an hour after the credits are different things. Every quote links to its source.
“Were there parts that were slow and maybe unnecessary?”
AceHallabout 0–100% inread it ↗
“The main story doesn't emerge until an hour has passed with the first hour being slow, uninteresting and just plain aggravating.”
hoops2448about 0–50% inread it ↗
“Günümüz için eskimiş durumda. Daha güncel yapımlara yönelmenizi tavsiye ederim...”
MzKread it ↗
“S.W.A.T. is underappreciated, not because of its solid acting, or worthwhile action, but for its tongue-in-cheek dialogue and realistic sequences. It manages to be exciting and fast-paced while engaging in a commentary on the aspects of police work in society.”
ourtimehascomeread it ↗
“Competent actioner. S.W.A.T. is neither here nor there, in that if it was made ten years earlier it would in all probability be better thought of. The problem is that there is such a long line of action movies that entertain without pushing the boat out, some, like S.W.A.T., throw a good cast list at it and hope that carries the film through, others just go over the top with the pyrotechnics and think that is job done. Abandon hope of something fresh and exhilaratingly kinetic and S.W.A.T. pa”
John Chardread it ↗
no tags yet — rate this flick to drop some vibes ✨