pulling the feelsβ¦
pulling the feelsβ¦
FLICKFEEL
β
from 17 comments
COMMUNITY
β
nobody yet
YOURS
β
β¦
FUN
0
how good a time it was
MEANINGFUL
0
how much it moved you
Two separate readings, not parts of the score β the score says how much of it held you, these say what kind of watch it was.
Nobody has rated this on FlickFeel yet. This is public discussion of this title, read into a curve. It is not a rating and it never becomes one.
Read from 17 comments (15 from Metacritic, 2 from TMDB reviews) β 5 of them described how it moves.
Thin evidence β the shape below rests on 5 comments. The shaded band is how wide the uncertainty actually is, and it is drawn to scale.
Not enough people said when to name this shape. The line is what the evidence draws, not a finding.
Hover the curveDrag across the curve to see what people said at any point.
βThe actual story of the sword in the stone is very short, because it's not interestingβ
Kamurai Β· TMDB reviews β
βjust a bit disapointed that Madame Mim was not in it for too longβ
rive040 Β· Metacritic β
βbeyond the episodic fun, the film struggles to find directionβ
johannultimate Β· Metacritic β
βThe plot is incredibly thin and doesnβt build to a meaningful climaxβ
johannultimate Β· Metacritic β
βel abrupto y forzado finalβ
Panchogul Β· Metacritic β
βthe ending feels a bit abruptβ
Richmond95 Β· Metacritic β
Read 28 Aug 2026 Β· confidence 12% Β· too thin for a score Β· how this works
Published reviews, not felt experience β a different question from the one above, and never mixed into the FlickFeel score.
βThe picture makes an eye-filling package of rollicking fun and thoughtful common sense. The humor sparkles with real, knowing sophistication.β
Bosley Crowther, The New York Times Β· 90
βAt first glance, you might have expected the film to be a grand epic with some comedy. Instead, itβs largely a comedy with some serious moments.β
Greg Ehrbar, IndieWire Β· 75
βIt emerges as a tasty confection.β
Staff (Not Credited), Variety Β· 70
βDisneyβs adaptation of the first book in T. W. Whiteβs colourful Arthurian trilogy The Once And Future King (which also served as the source for the musical Camelot) is formulaic matinee fare, competent and sprightly but undistinguished.β
William Thomas, Empire Β· 60
βThe high point of the picture is the antics of Merlin; at one point he's hilariously funny in his absentmindedness, and the next he shows his cunning.β
Staff (Not Credited), TV Guide Magazine Β· 50
Scores from Metacritic and Rotten Tomatoes, read 28 Aug 2026. Quotes belong to their publications and link to the full reviews.
Grouped by where it was written, because a considered review and a reaction typed an hour after the credits are different things. Every quote links to its source.
βjust a bit disapointed that Madame Mim was not in it for too longβ
rive040about 60β80% inread it β
βbeyond the episodic fun, the film struggles to find directionβ
johannultimateabout 33β66% inread it β
βThe plot is incredibly thin and doesnβt build to a meaningful climaxβ
johannultimateabout 75β100% inread it β
βel abrupto y forzado finalβ
Panchogulabout 75β100% inread it β
βThe actual story of the sword in the stone is very short, because it's not interestingβ
Kamuraiabout 75β100% inread it β
β"Arthur" - rather unkindly nick-named "Wart" is a stable boy with grand ambitions. He wants to be the squire to a bold and chivalrous knight. Those plans are soon up in the air, though, when he has a chance encounter with "Merlin" in the forest and is soon the wizard's pet project. You see, the wise if scatty old man knows the true identity of the young man, and is determined to prepare him for what's to come. What now ensues isn't so much an Arthurian legend, more a compendium of fun and colourβ
CinemaSerfread it β
no tags yet β rate this flick to drop some vibes β¨