pulling the feelsβ¦
pulling the feelsβ¦
FLICKFEEL
56
from 32 comments
COMMUNITY
β
nobody yet
YOURS
β
β¦
FUN
4
how good a time it was
MEANINGFUL
42
how much it moved you
Two separate readings, not parts of the score β the score says how much of it held you, these say what kind of watch it was.
Nobody has rated this on FlickFeel yet. This is public discussion of this title, read into a curve. It is not a rating and it never becomes one.
Read from 32 comments (28 from Metacritic, 4 from TMDB reviews) β 11 of them described how it moves.
Thin evidence β the shape below rests on 11 comments. The shaded band is how wide the uncertainty actually is, and it is drawn to scale.
Not enough people said when to name this shape. The line is what the evidence draws, not a finding.
Hover the curveDrag across the curve to see what people said at any point.
βthe narrative rhythm felt incredibly "stagnant" and burdened by a level of sentimentality that failed to shatter the fourth wall of my skepticism. The 95% preservation of my memory from that viewing is dominated by the repetitive and predictable emotional beats that lacked the "sensational" or "chewy" payoffβ
famfacat Β· Metacritic β
βa lot of times throughout the motion picture, babies would be thrown into the mix in an attempt to faze the audience or gain some sympathy. No large bonds were built with any of the characters, the drama came more from the characters accepting death more than death occurring. We have no reason to be sad, so why cry?β
TheObsolete Β· Metacritic β
βgreat ending with no happy endingβ
eva3si0n Β· Metacritic β
βthis makes it a lot slower and monotonous than we might at first glanceβ
FilipeNeto Β· Metacritic β
βThere are some cool apocalyptic effects towards the end - action fans will probably want to just skip ahead to thoseβ
Trailesque Β· Metacritic β
βendormir son audienceβ
Broyax Β· Metacritic β
Read 28 Aug 2026 Β· confidence 73% Β· scored on the same 0-100 scale as a community score Β· how this works
Published reviews, not felt experience β a different question from the one above, and never mixed into the FlickFeel score.
It plays better than it reviews β the watch lands harder than the write-ups suggest.
βDeep Impact confines much of its horror to television news reports and has a more brooding, thoughtful tone than this genre usually calls for.β
Janet Maslin, The New York Times Β· 70
βLeder establishes a syncopated rhythm unlike anything we're used to in a catastrophe spectacle.β
Lisa Schwarzbaum, Entertainment Weekly Β· 67
βYou can enjoy the way they create little flashes of wit in the dialogue, which enlivens what is, after all, a formula disaster movie.β
Roger Ebert, Chicago Sun-Times Β· 63
βDeep Impact, a triple-strand ensemble disaster flick, has a few good opening minutes, the biggest tidal wave you've ever seen in the closing minutes, and a cluster of little meandering melodramas in between.β
Liam Lacey, The Globe and Mail (Toronto) Β· 63
βUnfortunately, an A-list group of actors doesn't mean a lot when there isn't much of a script.β
James Berardinelli, ReelViews Β· 63
Scores from Metacritic and Rotten Tomatoes, read 28 Aug 2026. Quotes belong to their publications and link to the full reviews.
it plays better than it reviews β critics 43, the watch 56
Grouped by where it was written, because a considered review and a reaction typed an hour after the credits are different things. Every quote links to its source.
βthe narrative rhythm felt incredibly "stagnant" and burdened by a level of sentimentality that failed to shatter the fourth wall of my skepticism. The 95% preservation of my memory from that viewing is dominated by the repetitive and predictable emotional beats that lacked the "sensational" or "chewy" payoffβ
famfacatabout 0β100% inread it β
βa lot of times throughout the motion picture, babies would be thrown into the mix in an attempt to faze the audience or gain some sympathy. No large bonds were built with any of the characters, the drama came more from the characters accepting death more than death occurring. We have no reason to be sad, so why cry?β
TheObsoleteabout 0β100% inread it β
βgreat ending with no happy endingβ
eva3si0nabout 75β100% inread it β
βthis makes it a lot slower and monotonous than we might at first glanceβ
FilipeNetoabout 0β100% inread it β
βI was really disappointed, considering all of the great actors involved and since I love science fiction and the great disaster films of days gone by. I bought the DVD used and got my money's worth--it's a decent watch. I would recommend watching if you like disaster movies or any of the actors involved, maybe even renting or buying the DVD used or for a really good price new, say for 5 bucks, but anything more would be wasteful or being ripped off.β
talisencrwread it β
βThis could have been so very much better had director Mimi Leder focussed on creating either a decent science fiction film or an extinction event family drama, rather than this messy hybrid with too many slushy emotional sub plots. TΓ©a Leoni is a television journalist assigned to investigate the resignation of a senior US Government official (James Cromwell) during which she discovers that a comet discovered a year earlier is on a collision course with Earth. President Morgan Freeman convinces hβ
CinemaSerfread it β
βNot your typical disaster movie. In my mind this was far better than Armageddon, which came out about the same time. Instead focusing on chaos and selfishness this movie gave us a positive portrayal of people dealing with an unthinkable tragedy. I found it to be realistic and hopeful. People helped each other and sacrificed for others, even in some cases people they didn't even like. There was the expected upbeat ending with a President rallying the people, but I really got the feeling that thesβ
Bytecrawlerread it β
no tags yet β rate this flick to drop some vibes β¨