pulling the feelsβ¦
pulling the feelsβ¦
FLICKFEEL
76
from 40 comments
COMMUNITY
β
nobody yet
YOURS
β
β¦
FUN
50
how good a time it was
MEANINGFUL
63
how much it moved you
Two separate readings, not parts of the score β the score says how much of it held you, these say what kind of watch it was.
Nobody has rated this on FlickFeel yet. This is public discussion of this title, read into a curve. It is not a rating and it never becomes one.
Read from 40 comments (35 from Metacritic, 5 from TMDB reviews) β 11 of them described how it moves.
Thin evidence β the shape below rests on 11 comments. The shaded band is how wide the uncertainty actually is, and it is drawn to scale.
Not enough people said when to name this shape. The line is what the evidence draws, not a finding.
Hover the curveDrag across the curve to see what people said at any point.
βtwists and turns that start just five minutes in and keep running all the way through to the endβ
Gimly Β· TMDB reviews β
βRonny Cox is just dreadful as "Cohaagen" which does prove important towards the end of the filmβ
CinemaSerf Β· TMDB reviews β
βthe reactor sequences towards the end look terrificβ
kevin2019 Β· TMDB reviews β
βthe endingβ
OneManManyGames Β· Metacritic β
Read 25 Aug 2026 Β· confidence 92% Β· scored on the same 0-100 scale as a community score Β· how this works
Published reviews, not felt experience β a different question from the one above, and never mixed into the FlickFeel score.
It plays better than it reviews β the watch lands harder than the write-ups suggest.
βOne of the most complex and visually interesting science fiction movies in a long time.β
Roger Ebert, Chicago Sun-Times Β· 88
βStarts out as mind-bending futuristic satire and then turns relentless -- it becomes a violent, postpunk version of an Indiana Jones cliff-hanger.β
Owen Gleiberman, Entertainment Weekly Β· 83
βA worthy entry in the dystopian cycle of SF movies launched by "Blade Runner" (including "The Terminator" and "Robocop"), this seems less derivative than most of its predecessors yet equally accomplished in its straight-ahead storytelling, with plenty of provocative satiric undertones and scenic details.β
Jonathan Rosenbaum, Chicago Reader Β· 80
βFast, witty, glamorous, with thrill piling on giggle atop gasp. [11 June 1990, p.85]β
Richard Corliss, Time Β· 80
βIf the movie sometimes seems overwhelmed by its budget and its legendary third-act problems, it's still entertainingly raw and brutal, full of whiplash pace and juicy exaggeration. [1 June 1990, Calendar, p.F-1]β
Michael Wilmington, Los Angeles Times Β· 80
Scores from Metacritic and Rotten Tomatoes, read 25 Aug 2026. Quotes belong to their publications and link to the full reviews.
Grouped by where it was written, because a considered review and a reaction typed an hour after the credits are different things. Every quote links to its source.
βthe endingβ
OneManManyGamesabout 75β100% inread it β
βGreetings from Lithuania. "Total Recall" (1990) is a great action, science fiction film from brilliant director Paul Verhoeven. Arnold Schwarzenegger stared in this movie that i have revisited now in 2024 on 4K UHD version that i own. Its a superbly paced movie that at 2 hours is never boring or not entertaining. And despite of great make up, action scenes, superb speciall effects that this movie - its the story that separates this movie from a bunch of other in this genre. Its an excellent, mulβ
badshapedread it β
βLove Action? Love Sci-fi? Love Espionage? Love Arnold movies? This is a 90s classic that does all of them in the best worst best way!β
tentongeekread it β
βtwists and turns that start just five minutes in and keep running all the way through to the endβ
Gimlyabout 8β100% inread it β
βRonny Cox is just dreadful as "Cohaagen" which does prove important towards the end of the filmβ
CinemaSerfabout 75β100% inread it β
βthe reactor sequences towards the end look terrificβ
kevin2019about 75β100% inread it β
no tags yet β rate this flick to drop some vibes β¨