pulling the feelsβ¦
pulling the feelsβ¦
FLICKFEEL
67
from 51 comments
COMMUNITY
β
nobody yet
YOURS
β
β¦
FUN
27
how good a time it was
MEANINGFUL
46
how much it moved you
Two separate readings, not parts of the score β the score says how much of it held you, these say what kind of watch it was.
Nobody has rated this on FlickFeel yet. This is public discussion of this title, read into a curve. It is not a rating and it never becomes one.
Read from 51 comments (47 from Metacritic, 4 from TMDB reviews) β 16 of them described how it moves.
Thin evidence β the shape below rests on 16 comments. The shaded band is how wide the uncertainty actually is, and it is drawn to scale.
Not enough people said when to name this shape. The line is what the evidence draws, not a finding.
Hover the curveDrag across the curve to see what people said at any point.
βmovie was a little slow and drawn outβ
rookiebeotch Β· TMDB reviews β
βThe ending has a very similar twist.β
Vadertime Β· Metacritic β
βwhich starts off with a fair amount of action and drama, the viewer trying to figure out whats going on, how looping works, the characters and their standing etc.β
DawdlingPoet Β· Metacritic β
βthe pace slows down mid way through, with more emphasis on the characters background and your left wondering how things will pan out.β
DawdlingPoet Β· Metacritic β
βThere are some pretty haunting scenes towards the end of the movie when one particular character shows a menacing side.β
DawdlingPoet Β· Metacritic β
βit stops from being great due to being marred with more than one pointless action scene that just drags onβ
theirrelephants Β· Metacritic β
Read 25 Aug 2026 Β· confidence 100% Β· scored on the same 0-100 scale as a community score Β· how this works
Published reviews, not felt experience β a different question from the one above, and never mixed into the FlickFeel score.
It reviews better than it plays β admired more than it is enjoyed.
βDirector Rian Johnson's resulting film, a cornfield neo-noir, is the coolest, most-confident sci-fi flick since 2006's "Children of Men."β
Amy Nicholson, Boxoffice Magazine Β· 100
βThe best sci-fi movie since "Moon." The best time-travel yarn since "12 Monkeys." And one of the best films of 2012. You'll immediately want to see it again.β
James Mottram, Total Film Β· 100
βIntelligent science-fiction sometimes seems an endangered species - too much physics and there's a risk of creating something cold and remote, too many explosions and get lost in the multiplex. Looper isn't perfect, but it pulls off the full Wizard Of Oz: it has a brain, courage and a heart.β
Kim Newman, Empire Β· 100
βLooper is a tremendous motion picture experience. Not merely a "very good" one, but a great one.β
James Berardinelli, ReelViews Β· 100
βSo what's left for the audience to hook into? Only pounding action, elegant style, steady-state suspense, marvelous acting and, despite that droll pooh-poohing every now and then, haunting explorations of youth, age and personal destiny. It's a lot to claim for a sci-fi thriller, but I was blown away by Rian Johnson's Looper.β
Joe Morgenstern, Wall Street Journal Β· 100
Scores from Metacritic and Rotten Tomatoes, read 24 Aug 2026. Quotes belong to their publications and link to the full reviews.
it reviews better than it plays β critics 89, the watch 67
Grouped by where it was written, because a considered review and a reaction typed an hour after the credits are different things. Every quote links to its source.
βThe ending has a very similar twist.β
Vadertimeabout 75β100% inread it β
βwhich starts off with a fair amount of action and drama, the viewer trying to figure out whats going on, how looping works, the characters and their standing etc.β
DawdlingPoetabout 0β33% inread it β
βthe pace slows down mid way through, with more emphasis on the characters background and your left wondering how things will pan out.β
DawdlingPoetabout 33β66% inread it β
βThere are some pretty haunting scenes towards the end of the movie when one particular character shows a menacing side.β
DawdlingPoetabout 75β100% inread it β
βmovie was a little slow and drawn outβ
rookiebeotchabout 0β100% inread it β
βI am normally fairly hesitant concerning time-travel movies because it is next to impossible to get them right. They more or less always become very unrealistic and full of paradoxes. I would almost go as far as to say that producers making serious (non-comedy) time travel movies are the ones that are scientifically too stupid to realise that it is just going to be a mess, or they do not really care about the issues hoping that the audience also will not care. This movie is really proof of thβ
Dark Jediread it β
βneither here nor there Time travel can be an exciting plot device - if the writers take time to check and get everything right. Unfortunately, with Looper, they did not. Nor did director or producers choose a clear direction what this movie was supposed to be, what its pace and atmosphere should be like. So it turned out to be full of wasted potential. Good ideas, characters, situations, plot elements it all had at some points - but none developed, really. That's more disappointing that iβ
β**Half-baked and weak genre mix with a pale Bruce Willis** The main character is an anti-hero and isn't able to win the viewer over story emotionally - that would be OK if the story were at least coherent - but it isn't. The time travel logic doesn't work. The telekinesis nonsense seems incredibly pointless. The love story(s) is or are hardly comprehensible. And many plot elements are started without being brought to a meaningful end. Too bad - there was potentials there. So the whole thing iβ
no tags yet β rate this flick to drop some vibes β¨
cineast78read it β