pulling the feels…
pulling the feels…
FLICKFEEL
—
from 27 comments
COMMUNITY
—
nobody yet
YOURS
—
…
FUN
10
how good a time it was
MEANINGFUL
2
how much it moved you
Two separate readings, not parts of the score — the score says how much of it held you, these say what kind of watch it was.
Nobody has rated this on FlickFeel yet. This is public discussion of this title, read into a curve. It is not a rating and it never becomes one.
Read from 27 comments (24 from Metacritic, 3 from TMDB reviews) — 2 of them described how it moves.
Thin evidence — the shape below rests on 2 comments. The shaded band is how wide the uncertainty actually is, and it is drawn to scale.
Not enough people said when to name this shape. The line is what the evidence draws, not a finding.
Hover the curveDrag across the curve to see what people said at any point.
“the beginning of the film does not have funny or attractive scenes”
Aidin004 · Metacritic ↗
“in the middle of the film, the situation is a little better”
Aidin004 · Metacritic ↗
“Chris Tucker's antics get worn thin after the first 5 minutes”
ryancarroll88 · Metacritic ↗
Read 26 Aug 2026 · confidence 11% · too thin for a score · how this works
Published reviews, not felt experience — a different question from the one above, and never mixed into the FlickFeel score.
“Superior sequel, which is the very model of the limber, transnational Hollywood action comedy.”
Robert Koehler, Variety · 80
“Winds up being faster and funnier than the first time. Chan's acrobatic high jinks play strikingly off of Tucker's wiseass humor.”
Peter Travers, Rolling Stone · 80
“Oy, it's such a pleasure that you'll be begging for Rush Hour 3.”
Kevin Maynard, Mr. Showbiz · 80
“A winning combination. By some bizarre quirk of star chemistry, their persona complement each other, the action scenes have comic flair and the movie is mindless fun.”
William Arnold, Seattle Post-Intelligencer · 75
“Action and comedy are more impressive here than in the first film.”
Charles Savage, Miami Herald · 75
Scores from Metacritic and Rotten Tomatoes, read 26 Aug 2026. Quotes belong to their publications and link to the full reviews.
Grouped by where it was written, because a considered review and a reaction typed an hour after the credits are different things. Every quote links to its source.
“the beginning of the film does not have funny or attractive scenes”
Aidin004about 0–33% inread it ↗
“in the middle of the film, the situation is a little better”
Aidin004about 33–66% inread it ↗
“Chris Tucker's antics get worn thin after the first 5 minutes”
ryancarroll88about 0–5% inread it ↗
“A very fun movie! Very enjoyable. I like the fact that it takes place right after the first movie.”
Akoltuniukread it ↗
“Didn't know I had a favourite _Rush Hour_ movie until today. I guess I do, and it's this one. Still pretty crap though. _Final rating:★★ - Definitely not for me, but I sort of get the appeal._”
Gimlyread it ↗
“20 Jahre ist Rush Hour 2 nun alt und tatsächlich habe ich den Film nun zum ersten Mal geschaut. Den ersten Teil habe ich auch erst 10 Jahre nach seiner Erstveröffentlichung geschaut und nun darf man natürlich gespannt sein, ob die Sichtung von Teil 3 erst 30 Jahre nach seiner Veröffentlichung passiert. Doch zurück zum Thema, meiner Meinung zu Rush Hour 2. Harmonieren Chris Tucker und Jackie Chan im ersten Teil noch perfekt zusammen ist diese Harmonie in der Fortsetzung ein wenig verloren gegange”
Michaelread it ↗
“OK, for those of you who, like me, liked Rush Hour, do yourselves a favor and stay away from this. What we have here is basically Lethal Weapon 4 set in Hong Kong rather than LA. And... it just doesn't work. Everything (save the stars) that made the first one funny is kind of out of place and forgotten. It's horrible. The fish out of water scenario fits well in Rush Hour, but set in Hong Kong, Tucker comes across as obnoxious instead of funny. It's horrible.”
GenerationofSwineread it ↗
no tags yet — rate this flick to drop some vibes ✨