pulling the feels…
pulling the feels…
FLICKFEEL
69
from 53 comments
COMMUNITY
—
nobody yet
YOURS
—
…
FUN
13
how good a time it was
MEANINGFUL
43
how much it moved you
Two separate readings, not parts of the score — the score says how much of it held you, these say what kind of watch it was.
Nobody has rated this on FlickFeel yet. This is public discussion of this title, read into a curve. It is not a rating and it never becomes one.
Read from 53 comments (50 from Metacritic, 3 from TMDB reviews) — 15 of them described how it moves.
Thin evidence — the shape below rests on 15 comments. The shaded band is how wide the uncertainty actually is, and it is drawn to scale.
Not enough people said when to name this shape. The line is what the evidence draws, not a finding.
Hover the curveDrag across the curve to see what people said at any point.
“The film's opening perfectly sets out the tone for the entire picture”
John Chard · TMDB reviews ↗
“the concluding twenty minutes are borderline farce”
CinemaSerf · TMDB reviews ↗
“starts off strong with a fantastic first act”
Nathan · TMDB reviews ↗
“The first act was really strong”
Nathan · TMDB reviews ↗
“slowly stumbles into mediocrity with a lackluster finale”
Nathan · TMDB reviews ↗
“But towards the end of the second act, the film starts to drag on”
Nathan · TMDB reviews ↗
Read 26 Aug 2026 · confidence 100% · scored on the same 0-100 scale as a community score · how this works
Published reviews, not felt experience — a different question from the one above, and never mixed into the FlickFeel score.
“This funny, gory stab-athon is as sophisticated about the mechanics of Part 2s as the original was savvy about horror flicks.”
Lisa Schwarzbaum, Entertainment Weekly · 91
“Inevitably a little patchier and less startlingly original than its predecessor -- S2 is an ingenious, often hilarious, movie that does nothing to diminish the well-deserved cult reputation of its director.”
Andrew O'Hehir, Salon · 90
“Visceral, witty and appropriately redundant, the sequel has a winning commercial recipe that's certain to cook up excellent returns in all areas.”
Leonard Klady, Variety · 80
“Only a few sequels have been as good as the originals; the characters especially like "Aliens'' and "The Godfather, Part II.'' As for Scream 2, it's ... well, it's about as good as the original.”
Roger Ebert, Chicago Sun-Times · 75
“Paradoxically, there's a lot less gore. There is blood, of course, but nothing excessive by slasher-movie standards, and there are no depictions of spilled entrails. Craven has remembered that scares are more important that graphic displays of human insides and bodily fluids.”
James Berardinelli, ReelViews · 75
Scores from Metacritic and Rotten Tomatoes, read 26 Aug 2026. Quotes belong to their publications and link to the full reviews.
Grouped by where it was written, because a considered review and a reaction typed an hour after the credits are different things. Every quote links to its source.
“The statement that opens the film, positioned as social critique—the supposed exclusion of Black women within the genre—is such an erroneous idea that it feels jarring.”
chriss17euabout 0–15% inread it ↗
“unfortunately, it doesn’t last beyond those first few minutes.”
chriss17euabout 15–75% inread it ↗
“The problem is that it works very well once; the second time around, it loses momentum and, therefore, impact.”
chriss17euabout 75–100% inread it ↗
“The opening never convinced me, and although it weighs on me more now, I still don’t like it.”
chriss17euabout 0–15% inread it ↗
“The film's opening perfectly sets out the tone for the entire picture”
John Chardabout 0–10% inread it ↗
“the concluding twenty minutes are borderline farce”
CinemaSerfabout 80–100% inread it ↗
“starts off strong with a fantastic first act”
Nathanabout 0–33% inread it ↗
“The first act was really strong”
Nathanabout 0–33% inread it ↗
no tags yet — rate this flick to drop some vibes ✨