Fifty Shades Darker

“the beginning was just awful and full of cringe-inducing dialog and logic on the part of the main protagonist”

Yackemflaber▲ 36about 0–15% inread it ↗

“once the movie got into its full-swing I thought it did some things much better than the original, such as showing actual chemistry between the two leads”

Yackemflaber▲ 36about 15–100% inread it ↗

“It was definitely better than the first movie but it not as good as the book. Casting is still funky and I can't understand why Mia is blonde.”

ChasingLena▲ 16read it ↗

“Thank you for taking the time to write this and not just saying "it's crap." It's definitely interesting how some movies can exist in this space where they're objectively bad and universally panned yet still find an enthusiastic audience (which isn't me btw). The biggest difference for me between these two movies was that we finally saw some snippets of Ana being able to contribute more to a relationship than just being a blank object of unlimited affection for absolutely no reason. She leap”

nobahdi▲ 12read it ↗

“As the movie ended, I didn't feel any kind of intensity or anything. Nothing to tempt me to watch the next one.”

MrPajamasabout 85–100% inread it ↗

“It was dull and so rushed! Everything was rushed.”

meydianarizki21about 0–100% inread it ↗

“With the small-small developments the film goes all the way to the ending. That means, those who are watching it for the selected scenes, will surely would have a nice time.”

LeZeeabout 75–100% inread it ↗

“the story a complete bore”

BrianMcCriticabout 0–100% inread it ↗

“Yeah, that takes all of about 5 minutes of time in the film. It's the plot of the movie...and it takes about 5 minutes total. The problem is solved really quickly, in the middle of the film, and never comes up again.”

GenerationofSwineabout 0–8% inread it ↗

“**The next fifty shades between an ordinary woman and a billionaire.** The film was not received well as the book was. Just like the first film, it has been another below average. Might be because of its theme. Usually this kind of films do great business, but ratings and reviews does not praise or encourage the film. So I doubt anybody will be bored of it, which means watchable film and instead it won't be their favourite. The story continued and this time it was not based on experiment o”

Renoread it ↗

“<em>'Fifty Shades Darker'</em> is a surprise small improvement on its predecessor, though admittedly not anything worthy of describing as good. It felt like this one had a touch more meat on the bones, it's slightly more digestible anyway; if ignoring events last time out. The film does take the cheap way out mind you, focusing on two 'worse' characters which allows you to look past the iffy questions regarding the leading pair's relationship. I didn't cringe as much for this 2017 flick, whic”

r96skread it ↗

“Poor old “Christian” (Jamie Dornan) is pining for “Ana” (Dakota Johnson) and so manages to wheedle his way back into her life - by buying her publisher employers, and by promising to change from his more sadistic self into something altogether more agreeable to her. Snag? Well she isn’t really interested in a newly reformed boyfriend, but instead craves the leather trappings of their sexual adventures. What she isn’t so keen on, either, is her introduction to some of his previous playmates - som”