pulling the feels…
pulling the feels…
FLICKFEEL
50
from 57 comments
COMMUNITY
—
nobody yet
YOURS
—
…
FUN
25
how good a time it was
MEANINGFUL
54
how much it moved you
Two separate readings, not parts of the score — the score says how much of it held you, these say what kind of watch it was.
Nobody has rated this on FlickFeel yet. This is public discussion of this title, read into a curve. It is not a rating and it never becomes one.
Read from 57 comments (49 from Metacritic, 8 from TMDB reviews) — 15 of them described how it moves.
Thin evidence — the shape below rests on 15 comments. The shaded band is how wide the uncertainty actually is, and it is drawn to scale.
Not enough people said when to name this shape. The line is what the evidence draws, not a finding.
Hover the curveDrag across the curve to see what people said at any point.
“absurdly bloated runtime”
Gimly · TMDB reviews ↗
“From the start, it feels like something is missing.”
RalphRahal · TMDB reviews ↗
“a great sense of adventure”
orca1 · Metacritic ↗
“a few awesome dinosaur action sequences”
orca1 · Metacritic ↗
“captures the spirit of the original the most— sympathetic characters, suspenseful action, and a sense of wonder and terror”
orca1 · Metacritic ↗
“the thrilling San Diego chase”
KhalielPrime · Metacritic ↗
Read 25 Aug 2026 · confidence 100% · scored on the same 0-100 scale as a community score · how this works
Published reviews, not felt experience — a different question from the one above, and never mixed into the FlickFeel score.
“There was no way, no matter how much Spielberg flounce was imbued in this sprightly sequel, that it was going to be as good as the original. It isn't. By a long shot. But even two thirds of the way toward Jurassic Park is about a third better than your average buster of blocks.”
Ian Nathan, Empire · 80
“The Lost World (unlike Spielberg's original film) leaps head first into the action, rushing, it seems, to get the film's real stars -- the dinosaurs -- to the screen as quickly as possible, and it does so with considerable verve.”
Marc Savlov, Austin Chronicle · 78
“Much of this movie seems like a retread of Jurassic Park (with a little King Kong thrown in at the end), not because director Steven Spielberg is intentionally copying himself, but because there's really not much more that he can do with the premise.”
James Berardinelli, ReelViews · 75
“The story (adapted by Spielberg and David Koepp from Michael Chrichton's "Lost World") isn't much better than "Jurassic Park." And the predictability factor is high.”
Desson Thomson, Washington Post · 70
“For the first half-hour, the movie is pretty crummy. Even Spielberg appears bored with the script's lame setup, its quick evocation of the first movie and its wan establishment of human villains and heroes. Like any 50-year-old adolescent, he can't wait for the dinosaurs. And when he gets to them, the movie ceases to bear any relationship to conceits of narrative and becomes a sheer adrenalin spike to the brain stem.”
Stephen Hunter, Washington Post · 70
Scores from Metacritic and Rotten Tomatoes, read 24 Aug 2026. Quotes belong to their publications and link to the full reviews.
Grouped by where it was written, because a considered review and a reaction typed an hour after the credits are different things. Every quote links to its source.
“a great sense of adventure”
orca1about 0–100% inread it ↗
“a few awesome dinosaur action sequences”
orca1about 0–100% inread it ↗
“captures the spirit of the original the most— sympathetic characters, suspenseful action, and a sense of wonder and terror”
orca1about 0–100% inread it ↗
“the thrilling San Diego chase”
KhalielPrimeabout 80–90% inread it ↗
“absurdly bloated runtime”
Gimlyabout 0–100% inread it ↗
“From the start, it feels like something is missing.”
RalphRahalabout 0–15% inread it ↗
“MORE REVIEWS @ https://www.msbreviews.com/ The Lost World definitely didn't deserve its originally bad reception. Sure, it's far from the incredible 1993's Jurassic Park. Less interesting character arcs and overall (silly) story. However, it remains fun enough with equally memorable dinosaur sequences. Goldblum rocks. Rating: B-”
Manuel São Bentoread it ↗
“I feel I should point out that my overall positive review is based on entertainment value and not at all on scientific accuracy and the like. This sequel mirrors a few of the winning elements from the successful first movie: they retain Ian Malcolm, who is one of the highlights of the first film; they bring in a child, because it is much more dramatic to endanger children; they have at least one bad guy who we root for to become Dino-dinner; and there are plenty of action sequences with heart”
Peter McGinnread it ↗
no tags yet — rate this flick to drop some vibes ✨