pulling the feelsβ¦
pulling the feelsβ¦
FLICKFEEL
46
from 102 comments
COMMUNITY
β
nobody yet
YOURS
β
β¦
FUN
8
how good a time it was
MEANINGFUL
61
how much it moved you
Two separate readings, not parts of the score β the score says how much of it held you, these say what kind of watch it was.
Nobody has rated this on FlickFeel yet. This is public discussion of this title, read into a curve. It is not a rating and it never becomes one.
Read from 102 comments (62 from Reddit, 36 from Metacritic, 4 from TMDB reviews) β 23 of them described how it moves.
π flatline β One note, start to finish. Pulled both ways throughout β never simply one thing. Marked above the line: 2 that gave people chills, 1 that got a real laugh.
Hover the curveDrag across the curve to see what people said at any point.
βIt's just a bit of harmless fun that passes an hour or soβ
pottyaboutpotter1 Β· Reddit β
βHardly felt any tension during the more stressing scenes.β
Jksaw2 Β· Reddit β
βThe nit pick that irritated me the most was near the end. So Alice doesn't put the Chronosphere back in time and time completely STOPS. Cut to beautiful shots of frozen Wonderland.. Oh, but some sparks form from it and the Chronosphere connects again...! BUT HOW?! Time has STOPPED, so how are sparks moving? No matter can move at all! Ridiculous.β
βThe 2nd act was a complete cluster fuck. The constant time-jumping was ridiculous and I felt the logic was very flawed.β
βThe ending seemed a bit eh thoughβ
saranii Β· Reddit β
βThe homage for Rickman at the end gave me the feelsβ
saranii Β· Reddit β
Read 25 Aug 2026 Β· confidence 100% Β· scored on the same 0-100 scale as a community score Β· how this works
Published reviews, not felt experience β a different question from the one above, and never mixed into the FlickFeel score.
βFor better or worse, Looking Glass loses none of the first filmβs muchness, with Bobin mimicking both his predecessorβs wildly saturated style and his general disregard for plot and substance.β
Leah Greenblatt, Entertainment Weekly Β· 67
βThe only heartfelt moment of this movie for me came in the end credits, with its dedication to the late Alan Rickman, who provided the voice for the blue butterfly (and former caterpillar) Absolem. What a voice, what an actor, what a loss.β
Peter Rainer, Christian Science Monitor Β· 67
βYou certainly get your 20 bucks worth of spectacle out of Alice Through the Looking Glass. So breathtaking are the landscapes, so whimsical are the creatures, so marvelous are the marvels that I wanted to give a standing ovation to whoever signed the check to pay for all this. Expensiver and expensiver!β
Kyle Smith, New York Post Β· 63
βBobinβs attempt to fill Tim Burtonβs shoes generates a lively but ersatz sequel that only truly ticks when Baron Cohen and Bonham Carter are around.β
Neil Smith, Total Film Β· 60
βWasikowska gives it her all, and Cohen shines, but while this is a better film than the first, that was a low bar to reach.β
Andrew Lowry, Empire Β· 60
Scores from Metacritic and Rotten Tomatoes, read 25 Aug 2026. Quotes belong to their publications and link to the full reviews.
it plays better than it reviews β critics 32, the watch 46
Grouped by where it was written, because a considered review and a reaction typed an hour after the credits are different things. Every quote links to its source.
βIt's just a bit of harmless fun that passes an hour or soβ
pottyaboutpotter1β² 71about 0β100% inread it β
βHardly felt any tension during the more stressing scenes.β
Jksaw2β² 48about 0β100% inread it β
βThe nit pick that irritated me the most was near the end. So Alice doesn't put the Chronosphere back in time and time completely STOPS. Cut to beautiful shots of frozen Wonderland.. Oh, but some sparks form from it and the Chronosphere connects again...! BUT HOW?! Time has STOPPED, so how are sparks moving? No matter can move at all! Ridiculous.β
β² 10about 75β100% inread it β
βThe 2nd act was a complete cluster fuck. The constant time-jumping was ridiculous and I felt the logic was very flawed.β
β² 10about 33β66% inread it β
βat first I thought the plot was a bit forcedβ
MarinRovikabout 0β15% inread it β
βmovie starts to get interesting pretty soonβ
MarinRovikabout 15β100% inread it β
βas I was at about half movie I was going to rate it much worse, as things got too clogged and were happening without order, it was rather confusing foβ
MarinRovikabout 50β100% inread it β
βThere are some films that are made only for the money that is expected to be collected from them. After seeing this film, I think it fits that description. "Alice in Wonderland" was a box office and critical hit, and had a good financial fit. The sequel, expected, takes advantage of the title of a novel that Lewis Carroll wrote after βAlice in Wonderlandβ. Just the title! The story has nothing to do with the book that, out of curiosity, turned 145 years in the year the film was released. The scβ
FilipeNetoread it β
βWell, at least that travesty of writer's brain damage told me to get the flop out of Dodge, so I'm kinda thankful it was presented so early on.β
Horsefaceabout 0β15% inread it β
β**Alice returns to the wonderland for a new adventure.** Based on the nearly 150 years old children's book, and a sequel to the 2010 film. Its quite a long gap for a follow up film, but the original cast has returned and directed by 'The Muppets' famed filmmaker. So, I was not expecting it since I considered the first film an average. All I wanted was a normal live-action 'Alice in Wonderland' films, but I disliked this weird make-ups and large head characters. In that perspective, this one wβ
Renoread it β
no tags yet β rate this flick to drop some vibes β¨