pulling the feels…
pulling the feels…
FLICKFEEL
70
from 52 comments
COMMUNITY
—
nobody yet
YOURS
—
…
FUN
30
how good a time it was
MEANINGFUL
35
how much it moved you
Two separate readings, not parts of the score — the score says how much of it held you, these say what kind of watch it was.
Nobody has rated this on FlickFeel yet. This is public discussion of this title, read into a curve. It is not a rating and it never becomes one.
Read from 52 comments (44 from Metacritic, 8 from TMDB reviews) — 29 of them described how it moves.
➖ steady — Holds one level all the way. Warm most of the way through. Very little of it ever resolves.
Hover the curveDrag across the curve to see what people said at any point.
“The first half of film is the story being relayed by Snook to Hawke”
John Chard · TMDB reviews ↗
“brings together the first half of the film so convincingly”
artlawless · TMDB reviews ↗
“the opening sequence, with a very noir aesthetic which really grabbed my attention”
Rob · TMDB reviews ↗
“The huge exposition dump in the bar early on utterly kills the pace the beginning sets you up to expect”
Rob · TMDB reviews ↗
“Now it does take it's time to get going”
CinemaSerf · TMDB reviews ↗
“whole story starts pretty quietly”
ahmetcanerkara · Metacritic ↗
Read 25 Aug 2026 · confidence 100% · scored on the same 0-100 scale as a community score · how this works
Published reviews, not felt experience — a different question from the one above, and never mixed into the FlickFeel score.
“The Spierig brothers have deftly fashioned an unpredictable thrill ride, and the joy is to fit together all its puzzle pieces.”
Martin Tsai, Los Angeles Times · 90
“A meticulously crafted, sparse but beautifully photographed full-length feature film with strong work from a reliable veteran and a breakout performance from an actor you might not have heard of before.”
Richard Roeper, Chicago Sun-Times · 88
“As the heart of the story, however, Sarah Snook delivers a knockout performance that calls on her to perform the kind of tricky scenes that could have resulted in bad laughs throughout if handled incorrectly. Not only does she pull off her performance brilliantly throughout—there is not one moment in which she is anything less that utterly convincing and believable.”
Peter Sobczynski, RogerEbert.com · 88
“If time-travel is your thing, you learn to shrug off inconsistencies. You debate chicken-egg questions over drinks or dope and mull over all the permutations. You graph it. You wish like hell you had a time machine. You savor every discombobulating, ludicrous, thrilling second of Predestination.”
David Edelstein, New York Magazine (Vulture) · 80
“A funny, affecting, twisted tale, which demands you pay close attention to every throwaway detail.”
Kim Newman, Empire · 80
Scores from Metacritic and Rotten Tomatoes, read 25 Aug 2026. Quotes belong to their publications and link to the full reviews.
Grouped by where it was written, because a considered review and a reaction typed an hour after the credits are different things. Every quote links to its source.
“whole story starts pretty quietly”
ahmetcanerkaraabout 0–15% inread it ↗
“the big reveal/crescendo is a sloppy, uncompelling cliché that leaves you totally unsatisfied”
elicitlyfeldmanabout 66–100% inread it ↗
“It's strange, confusing pacing that sets aside the root concept in lieu of a very long, seemingly-unrelated aside”
drqshadowabout 33–66% inread it ↗
“the film's chaotic, full-throttle closing act”
drqshadowabout 75–100% inread it ↗
“The first half of film is the story being relayed by Snook to Hawke”
John Chardabout 0–50% inread it ↗
“brings together the first half of the film so convincingly”
artlawlessabout 0–50% inread it ↗
“the opening sequence, with a very noir aesthetic which really grabbed my attention”
Robabout 0–15% inread it ↗
“The huge exposition dump in the bar early on utterly kills the pace the beginning sets you up to expect”
Robabout 15–33% inread it ↗
no tags yet — rate this flick to drop some vibes ✨