pulling the feels…
pulling the feels…
FLICKFEEL
65
from 46 comments
COMMUNITY
—
nobody yet
YOURS
—
…
FUN
23
how good a time it was
MEANINGFUL
41
how much it moved you
Two separate readings, not parts of the score — the score says how much of it held you, these say what kind of watch it was.
Nobody has rated this on FlickFeel yet. This is public discussion of this title, read into a curve. It is not a rating and it never becomes one.
Read from 46 comments (42 from Metacritic, 4 from TMDB reviews) — 10 of them described how it moves.
Thin evidence — the shape below rests on 10 comments. The shaded band is how wide the uncertainty actually is, and it is drawn to scale.
Not enough people said when to name this shape. The line is what the evidence draws, not a finding.
Hover the curveDrag across the curve to see what people said at any point.
“Film asla sıkmıyor.”
bayrahmi · Metacritic ↗
“At its running time 2 h 18 min this was a long film, but it never really dragged.”
badshaped · Metacritic ↗
“The only cringe in the last minutes when they move cranes for Spiderman to fly easier, that was terribly cringe.”
Henry_D · Metacritic ↗
“the pacing is quite good, it rarely feels flat or boring”
MatePolcz · Metacritic ↗
“After the second half, all the characters find depth and get better”
Burmun-B2010 · Metacritic ↗
“The conclusion is not very strong”
Burmun-B2010 · Metacritic ↗
Read 25 Aug 2026 · confidence 83% · scored on the same 0-100 scale as a community score · how this works
Published reviews, not felt experience — a different question from the one above, and never mixed into the FlickFeel score.
“Not just a reboot - it's a rejuvenation. From the first image of sensory awakening to the final acceptance of adult responsibility, it pulses with the warm blood of a very human hero.”
Joe Williams, St. Louis Post-Dispatch · 100
“What's most amazing in The Amazing Spider-Man turns out to be not the shared sensations of blockbuster wow! the picture elicits, but rather the shared satisfactions of intimate awww.”
Lisa Schwarzbaum, Entertainment Weekly · 91
“This is a more thoughtful film, and its action scenes are easier to follow in space and time. If we didn't really need to be told Spidey's origin story again, at least it's done with more detail and provides better reasons for why Peter Parker throws himself into his superhero role.”
Roger Ebert, Chicago Sun-Times · 88
“Did we need another Spider-Man this quickly? Debatable. But if you wanted a new interpretation – especially one where story and action stay in the right balance – this is it.”
Lawrence Toppman, Charlotte Observer · 88
“It's the successul synthesis of the two – action and emotion – that means this Spider-Man is as enjoyable as it is impressive: Webb's control of mood and texture is near faultless as his film switches from teenage sulks to exhilarating airborne pyrotechnics.”
Andrew Pulver, The Guardian · 80
Scores from Metacritic and Rotten Tomatoes, read 24 Aug 2026. Quotes belong to their publications and link to the full reviews.
Grouped by where it was written, because a considered review and a reaction typed an hour after the credits are different things. Every quote links to its source.
“Film asla sıkmıyor.”
bayrahmiabout 0–100% inread it ↗
“At its running time 2 h 18 min this was a long film, but it never really dragged.”
badshapedabout 0–100% inread it ↗
“The only cringe in the last minutes when they move cranes for Spiderman to fly easier, that was terribly cringe.”
Henry_Dabout 85–100% inread it ↗
“the pacing is quite good, it rarely feels flat or boring”
MatePolczabout 0–100% inread it ↗
““The Amazing Spider-Man” has no reason to exist. Spider-man is a hero everyone knows. He´s been around for so long everyone is familiar with his origin, comic fan or not. Its basic pop culture. Then you have the Sam Raimi´s movies. Everyone saw them. They made loads of money and they´re always on tv. They are entertaining movies. “Spider-Man” gave us a good origin story in 2002. This movie simply wasn't needed. Now I gave it the benefit of the doubt. There´s Burton´s Batman and Nolan´s. Maybe ”
tmdb23365124read it ↗
“This is the fourth spider man movie although it is not the fourth sequel but rather one of these reboots which seems to be so popular today. I found the movie to be quite enjoyable but at the same time a bit of a let-down. In some ways it is better than the previous trilogy by Sam Raimi (well it is not very hard to make something that is better than the 2nd installment in that trilogy of course). The film is darker, more serious and Spider Man is not so silly and a total mess-up when out of h”
Dark Jediread it ↗
“I enjoyed this. One of the great advantages of the whole "Spiderman" concept is that it can be reinvented time and time again without really compromising the original character - a decent but lonely young man trying to make his way in the world and to get his girl. Like Tobey Maguire before him, the casting of the largely unknown Andrew Garfield works well - it allows a whole new generation of fans to follow their hero. The fact that he is cute in tights doesn't do him any harm either. Emma Ston”
CinemaSerfread it ↗
no tags yet — rate this flick to drop some vibes ✨