pulling the feelsβ¦
pulling the feelsβ¦
FLICKFEEL
76
from 113 comments
COMMUNITY
β
nobody yet
YOURS
β
β¦
FUN
95
how good a time it was
MEANINGFUL
45
how much it moved you
Two separate readings, not parts of the score β the score says how much of it held you, these say what kind of watch it was.
Nobody has rated this on FlickFeel yet. This is public discussion of this title, read into a curve. It is not a rating and it never becomes one.
Read from 113 comments (67 from Reddit, 45 from Metacritic, 1 from TMDB reviews) β 32 of them described how it moves.
β steady β Holds one level all the way. Warm most of the way through. Marked above the line: 5 that got a real laugh.
Hover the curveDrag across the curve to see what people said at any point.
βWhen that professor did an impersonation of Tracy Morgan in the beginning, the whole theater broke out in uncomfortable laughter.β
fallenmonk Β· Reddit β
βFucking lost it.β
tacobellscannon Β· Reddit β
βAnd those credits...β
Titolian Β· Reddit β
βquite possibly the greatest use of end credits i've ever seenβ
zeppelin1023 Β· Reddit β
βDuring the beginning of the movie (on the "Previously on *21 Jump Street*" montage) cut in with all the actual footage from the movie is basically the exact lobster scene, except with Jonah Hill and Channing Tatum.β
ToasterOnWheels Β· Reddit β
β2121 Jump Street had me laughing so damn hardβ
Desper Β· Reddit β
Read 25 Aug 2026 Β· confidence 100% Β· scored on the same 0-100 scale as a community score Β· how this works
Published reviews, not felt experience β a different question from the one above, and never mixed into the FlickFeel score.
βA hugely enjoyable shambles. Itβs a comic deconstruction of that most useless of Hollywood artifacts β the blockbuster sequel β that refuses to take itself seriously on any level, which, face it, is just what we need as the summer boom-boom season shifts into high gear.β
Ty Burr, Boston Globe Β· 88
β22 Jump Street might not be quite as good as "21 Jump Street," but it's remarkably close, to the point where subsequent viewings could see it elevated above its predecessor.β
Oliver Lyttelton, The Playlist Β· 83
βSuffice it to say that it is a cannily-constructed film, and it does have a bigger "movie" feel than the first film. There are places where they swing for some big jokes that don't quite work, but the ambition is dizzying all the way through.β
Drew McWeeny, Hitfix Β· 83
βJust think back to everything that was funny in "21 Jump Street." It's exactly the same.β
Jeff Baker, Portland Oregonian Β· 83
ββ22β merits a B grade. The long final credits, in which Dickson imagines dozens of future scenarios for the undercover boys, kicks it up one notch.β
Lawrence Toppman, Charlotte Observer Β· 83
Scores from Metacritic and Rotten Tomatoes, read 24 Aug 2026. Quotes belong to their publications and link to the full reviews.
Grouped by where it was written, because a considered review and a reaction typed an hour after the credits are different things. Every quote links to its source.
βWhen that professor did an impersonation of Tracy Morgan in the beginning, the whole theater broke out in uncomfortable laughter.β
fallenmonkβ² 345about 0β15% inread it β
βFucking lost it.β
tacobellscannonβ² 278about 40β60% inread it β
βAnd those credits...β
Titolianβ² 260about 90β100% inread it β
βquite possibly the greatest use of end credits i've ever seenβ
zeppelin1023β² 223about 90β100% inread it β
βThe constant winks and nods do begin to grate by the end of the third actβ
drqshadowabout 75β100% inread it β
βThis movie spent too much time trying to make fun of itself that it ended up really not being funny.β
Stevesitzabout 0β100% inread it β
βthe rest of the movie is the characters actually telling the audience (yes, breaking the wall several times) that what they are watching is nothing new and really the same thing, if not less, as the first.β
Stevesitzabout 0β100% inread it β
βThe escalation at the end is also funny as hell, and the conclusion is just what the viewer needsβ
Waelabout 75β100% inread it β
β**From a review written in 2014:** Iβm sure if I really thought about it, I could easily fault _22 Jump Street_, second in the recent reboot of the 1987 TV series. But I donβt want to think about it, βcause I had a good time and thatβs how I choose to remember it. To Hell with what so-called βprofessionalβ critics are saying, _22 Jump Street_ is not dumb. Itβs actually pretty bloody smart. Itβs not particularly deep. Or thought-provoking. Or fresh. Or original. Or mature. Or cultured. Or sβ
Gimlyread it β
no tags yet β rate this flick to drop some vibes β¨