pulling the feels…
pulling the feels…
FLICKFEEL
78
from 44 comments
COMMUNITY
—
nobody yet
YOURS
—
…
FUN
46
how good a time it was
MEANINGFUL
46
how much it moved you
Two separate readings, not parts of the score — the score says how much of it held you, these say what kind of watch it was.
Nobody has rated this on FlickFeel yet. This is public discussion of this title, read into a curve. It is not a rating and it never becomes one.
Read from 44 comments (38 from Metacritic, 6 from TMDB reviews) — 11 of them described how it moves.
Thin evidence — the shape below rests on 11 comments. The shaded band is how wide the uncertainty actually is, and it is drawn to scale.
Not enough people said when to name this shape. The line is what the evidence draws, not a finding.
Hover the curveDrag across the curve to see what people said at any point.
“Those three alternate endings were still very confusing”
Peter89Spencer · TMDB reviews ↗
“an entertaining and funny ninety minutes”
CinemaSerf · TMDB reviews ↗
“a fast-paced”
ozzsoffy · Metacritic ↗
“Characters run around the mansion, secrets appear from everywhere, and the story becomes increasingly wild”
ozzsoffy · Metacritic ↗
“By the time the film reaches its ending, the movie delivers not one but three different endings, each explained with long stretches of dialogue that can feel heavy and sometimes confusing. It is definitely a case of “too much information” all at once.”
ozzsoffy · Metacritic ↗
“the mosrt confusing bit is the end where the murder is all of them”
rive040 · Metacritic ↗
Read 28 Aug 2026 · confidence 92% · scored on the same 0-100 scale as a community score · how this works
Published reviews, not felt experience — a different question from the one above, and never mixed into the FlickFeel score.
It plays better than it reviews — the watch lands harder than the write-ups suggest.
“On paper, this movie should not work, but what we got was an instant classic that is eminently rewatchable and assembled one of the best funny casts ever. The energy levels of the movie are off the charts, keeping it wildly entertaining even in today's short attention span world.”
Eric Vespe, Slashfilm · 90
“Clue is campy, high-styled escapism. In a short 87 minutes that just zip by, the well-known board game's one-dimensional card figures like Professor Plum and others become multi-dimensional personalities with enough wit, neuroses and motives to intrigue even the most adept whodunnit solver.”
Staff (Not Credited), Variety · 80
“Clue is comfortable with its pedigree, even giddily enthused by it, which gives its creators freedom to produce not a nostalgic entertainment, but a sustained and sincerely old-fashioned entertainment, laced with wicked miscreancy.”
Chris Cabin, Slant Magazine · 75
“This screwball comedy turned a rainy-day board game into inspiration — and attempted to answer the question of what Colonel Mustard has up his sleeve.”
Staff (Not Credited), Entertainment Weekly · 67
“There's a movie here, and there's a gimmick. The gimmick undermines the movie and the gimmick is attached to the wrong part of the movie. Other than that, Clue offers a few big laughs early on followed by a lot of characters running around on a treadmill to nowhere. [13 Dec 1985, p.38]”
Gene Siskel, Chicago Tribune · 63
Scores from Metacritic and Rotten Tomatoes, read 28 Aug 2026. Quotes belong to their publications and link to the full reviews.
it plays better than it reviews — critics 57, the watch 78
Grouped by where it was written, because a considered review and a reaction typed an hour after the credits are different things. Every quote links to its source.
“a fast-paced”
ozzsoffyabout 0–100% inread it ↗
“Characters run around the mansion, secrets appear from everywhere, and the story becomes increasingly wild”
ozzsoffyabout 0–100% inread it ↗
“By the time the film reaches its ending, the movie delivers not one but three different endings, each explained with long stretches of dialogue that can feel heavy and sometimes confusing. It is definitely a case of “too much information” all at once.”
ozzsoffyabout 75–100% inread it ↗
“the mosrt confusing bit is the end where the murder is all of them”
rive040about 75–100% inread it ↗
“Those three alternate endings were still very confusing”
Peter89Spencerabout 80–100% inread it ↗
“an entertaining and funny ninety minutes”
CinemaSerfabout 0–100% inread it ↗
“**_An amusing take on “And Then There Were None” and “Murder by Death”_** RELEASED IN 1985 and directed by Jonathan Lynn, "Clue" is a comedic murder mystery based on the board game featuring an “all-star” cast (Tim Curry, Madeline Kahn, Christopher Lloyd, Eileen Brennan, Lesley Ann Warren, etc.). This is a good movie if you’re in the mood for an amusing mystery that takes place during the McCarthy era (1954) almost entirely within a vast gothic mansion on a stormy night. It combines movies”
Wuchakread it ↗
“Cluedo Chaos. Clue is directed by Jonathan Lynn and he co-writes with John Landis and Anthony E. Pratt. It stars Eileen Brennan, Tim Curry, Christopher Lloyd, Madeline Kahn, Michael McKean, Martin Mull, Lesley Ann Warren, Colleen Camp and Lee Ving. Music is by John Morris and cinematography by Victor J. Kemper. Based on the board game Cluedo, plot finds six guests anonymously invited to a large mansion for dinner. All of them have something in common and when their host is killed, they mus”
John Chard
no tags yet — rate this flick to drop some vibes ✨