pulling the feels…
pulling the feels…
FLICKFEEL
—
from 17 comments
COMMUNITY
—
nobody yet
YOURS
—
…
FUN
0
how good a time it was
MEANINGFUL
0
how much it moved you
Two separate readings, not parts of the score — the score says how much of it held you, these say what kind of watch it was.
Nobody has rated this on FlickFeel yet. This is public discussion of this title, read into a curve. It is not a rating and it never becomes one.
Read from 17 comments (13 from Metacritic, 4 from TMDB reviews) — 1 of them described how it moves.
Thin evidence — the shape below rests on 1 comment. The shaded band is how wide the uncertainty actually is, and it is drawn to scale.
Not enough people said when to name this shape. The line is what the evidence draws, not a finding.
Hover the curveDrag across the curve to see what people said at any point.
“the character of Beale is continuously developed, and it's character arc is painful to witness from the very beginning to the end”
ahmedaiman9999 · Metacritic ↗
Read 28 Aug 2026 · confidence 2% · too thin for a score · how this works
Published reviews, not felt experience — a different question from the one above, and never mixed into the FlickFeel score.
“So the movie's flawed. So it leaves us with loose ends and questions. That finally doesn't bother me, because what it does accomplish is done so well, is seen so sharply, is presented so unforgivingly, that Network will outlive a lot of tidier movies.”
Roger Ebert, Chicago Sun-Times · 100
“Sidney Lumet’s direction is outstanding.”
A.D. Murphy, Variety · 100
“Network is typical of the cool intelligence of '70s American cinema.”
Colin Kennedy, Empire · 100
“Timeless and essential.”
Chris Nashawaty, Entertainment Weekly · 100
“This still-prescient vivisection of modern culture’s vapidity crackles with the nervous energy of midtown’s hothouse broadcasters.”
Stephen Garrett, Time Out · 100
Scores from Metacritic and Rotten Tomatoes, read 28 Aug 2026. Quotes belong to their publications and link to the full reviews.
Grouped by where it was written, because a considered review and a reaction typed an hour after the credits are different things. Every quote links to its source.
“the character of Beale is continuously developed, and it's character arc is painful to witness from the very beginning to the end”
ahmedaiman9999about 0–100% inread it ↗
“A blistering and prophetically brilliant satire that dissects media sensationalism with unmatched razor-sharp dialogue.2010 (5.0)Directed by Sidney Lumet and written by Paddy Chayefsky, "Network" (1976) is a biting, Oscar-winning satirical drama that scathingly critiques the dark side of television broadcasting and corporate greed. The story begins when veteran news anchor Howard Beale learns he is being fired due to declining ratings. In a moment of live, unscripted desperation, Beale announces”
famfacatread it ↗
“A great movie, but one I didn't particularly like. I would even argue that -- in parts -- it is not particularly well-made. The story of a crazed, aging newsman who is used and abused and discarded by ruthless TV networks is perhaps not as shocking today as it might have been in 1976. But evaluating it based on its terms at the time it was made, it was very prescient in its anticipation that outrage (at what? everything!) sells and that crime & violence, especially "reality" based, can be the b”
BradleySread it ↗
“More than 40 years later, anchorman Howard Beale’s (Peter Finch) tirade about being mad as hell and not taking it anymore feels more relevant than ever. Written by Paddy Chayefsky as if he was looking through a crystal ball, "Network" imagines what would happen if a television channel exploited its newsman’s mental breakdown for ratings. Duvall is the ratings-hungry executive, Faye Dunaway the craven programming executive, and William Holden the world-weary news producer. Director Sidney Lumet h”
davidlovesfilmread it ↗
“Few Hollywood productions have been as utterly prescient as director Sidney Lumet’s cinematic masterpiece “Network” (1976), a chillingly serious satire about the television business in the 1970s and where it was ultimately headed in years to come. Written by TV pioneer Paddy Chayefsky, this winner of four Oscars on 10 total nominations provides a comical but cynically disturbing look inside the workings of a fictitious American television network. In telling this story, the film eerily forecast ”
Brent Marchantread it ↗
no tags yet — rate this flick to drop some vibes ✨